Latest Performance News

Netcraft Hosting Provider Performance Monitoring

Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures over the last 1 day, updated every 15 mins. 42 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.308 0.010 0.030 0.069 1254 49
2 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.168 0.025 0.054 0.054 - 0
3 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.102 0.044 0.084 0.084 - 0
4 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.150 0.060 0.121 0.121 - 0
5 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.216 0.064 0.129 0.229 239 24
6 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.141 0.067 0.146 0.146 - 0
7 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.132 0.070 0.139 0.183 384 17
8 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.145 0.074 0.204 0.448 141 34
9 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.127 0.075 0.151 0.151 - 0
10 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.245 0.083 0.570 1.746 54 63
11 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.156 0.084 0.172 0.224 289 15
12 F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  0.000  0.143 0.084 0.288 0.599 149 46
13 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.161 0.085 0.167 0.213 248 11
14 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.104 0.089 0.172 0.172 - 0
15 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.296 0.102 0.357 0.803 234 104
16 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.142 0.108 0.213 0.213 - -
17 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.188 0.121 0.250 0.606 186 66
18 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.192 0.124 0.250 0.521 88 24
19 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.462  0.138 0.024 0.044 0.066 390 9
20 Linux  0:00:00  0.462  0.234 0.061 0.121 0.123 2601 3
21 unknown  0:00:00  0.462  0.091 0.069 0.135 0.135 - 0
22 Linux  0:00:00  0.462  0.248 0.071 0.142 0.142 - -
23 Linux  0:00:00  0.462  0.281 0.091 0.385 0.651 81 21
24 Linux  0:00:00  0.463  0.101 0.066 0.155 0.262 322 35
25 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.464  0.128 0.066 0.134 0.134 - 0
26 Linux  0:00:00  0.577  0.124 0.082 0.188 0.194 - -
27 Linux  0:00:00  0.577  0.247 0.082 0.168 0.168 - 0
28 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.577  0.134 0.084 0.171 0.928 96 72
29 Linux  0:00:00  0.577  0.210 0.108 0.195 0.200 - -
30 Linux  0:00:00  0.579  0.147 0.070 0.144 0.335 294 56
31 Linux  0:00:00  0.579  0.185 0.070 0.138 0.279 290 41
32 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.579  0.222 0.078 0.157 0.538 78 30
33 unknown  0:00:00  0.693  0.174 0.115 0.920 1.269 188 66
34 Linux  0:00:00  0.925  0.247 0.113 0.229 0.475 166 41
35 Linux  0:00:00  1.153  0.187 0.129 0.253 0.378 130 16
36 Linux  0:00:00  1.375  0.130 0.010 0.201 0.201 - 0
37 unknown  0:00:00  1.382  0.114 0.033 0.508 0.547 1045 41
38 unknown  0:00:00  1.384  0.104 0.023 0.213 0.215 477 1
39 unknown  0:00:00  1.722  0.099 0.012 1.172 1.290 714 85
40 unknown  0:00:00  2.059  0.238 0.015 0.032 0.099 790 53
41 unknown  0:00:00  2.275  0.157 0.093 0.259 0.259 - 0
42 Windows Server 2008  0:00:00  2.286  0.109 0.108 0.197 0.452 90 23
 

Report from 23-Oct-2014 06:51 till 24-Oct-2014 06:51

Generated on 24-Oct-2014 07:00

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, San Jose/Datapipe, Phoenix/GoDaddy, Italy/Aruba, Romania/Hostway, Zurich/Qube and Amsterdam/Webair. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.